A2010-578 exam Dumps Source : Assess: Fundamentals of Applying Tivoli Service Availability/Performance Ma
Test Code : A2010-578
Test denomination : Assess: Fundamentals of Applying Tivoli Service Availability/Performance Ma
Vendor denomination : IBM
braindumps : 120 real Questions
where will I locate prep fabric for A2010-578 exam?
I used to breathe very dissatisfied once I failed my A2010-578 exam. Searching the internet told me that there can breathe a website killexams.com thats the belongings that I requisite to pass the A2010-578 exam within no time. I purchase the A2010-578 steering percent.Containing questions answers and exam simulator, organized and hold a seat inside the exam and gotninety 8% marks. Thanks to the killexams.com team.
have a gape at experts exam bank and dumps to acquire superb success.
Your consumer thoughts abet experts were continuously available through tarry chat to tackle the maximum trifling troubles. Their advices and clarifications acquire been vast. This is to light up that I organize out how to pass my A2010-578 Security exam via my first utilizing killexams.com Dumps direction. Exam Simulator of A2010-578 by killexams.com is a superb too. I am amazingly pleased to acquire killexams.com A2010-578 route, as this valuable material helped me obtain my targets. Much liked.
wherein acquire to I search to derive A2010-578 actual hold a gape at questions?
much obliged to the one and most efficient killexams.com. its far the maximum truthful system to skip the exam. i would thank the killexams.com braindumps exam result, for my fulfillment in the A2010-578. exam became simplest 3 weeks ahead, once I started out to test this aide and it labored for me. I scored 89%, figuring out how to complete the exam in due time.
top notch supply! I were given real test questions concomitant A2010-578 exam.
In no manner ever perception of passing the A2010-578 exam answering utter questions efficiently. Hats off to you killexams. I wouldnt acquire completed this success with out the assist of your question and solution. It helped me draw proximate the concepts and i requisite to reply even the unknown questions. It is the real customized dump which met my necessity during education. Determined ninety percentage questions not unusual to the manual and replied them quickly to store time for the unknown questions and it worked. Thank you killexams.
How an entire lot A2010-578 examination and prep manual price?
I wanted to launch my own IT commercial enterprise however earlier than it, A2010-578 path was well-known for my business, so I determine to derive this certificate. When I took the admission for A2010-578 certification and took lectures I didnt recognize whatever. After some question I reached at killexams.com website and learnt from their and while my A2010-578 exam got here I did well as examine to the ones college students who took lectures and organized from A2010-578 test manual from this website. I recommend this internet site to all. I additionally thank to the employees of this internet site.
real test A2010-578 questions.
killexams.com A2010-578 braindump works. utter questions are genuine and the solutions are accurate. it is well worth the cash. I handed my A2010-578 exam final week.
You simply want a weekend to prepare A2010-578 examination with those dumps.
Every topic and vicinity, each situation, killexams.com A2010-578 material acquire been wonderful abet for me while getting ready for this exam and in reality doing it! I was worried, however going lower back to this A2010-578 braindumps and wondering that I understand the total thing due to the fact the A2010-578 exam changed into very light after the killexams.com stuff, I got an awesome result. Now, doing the next degree of IBM certifications.
Observed maximum A2010-578 Questions in actual test questions that I prepared.
Im now A2010-578 certified and it couldnt breathe workable without killexams.com A2010-578 exam simulator. killexams.com exam simulator has been tailor-made keeping in thoughts the necessities of the students which they confront at the time of taking A2010-578 exam. This sorting out engine may breathe very a lot exam attention and each issue depend has been addressed in factor simply to preserve apprised the scholars from every and each information. killexams.com organization is cognizant of that is the manner to maintain college college students assured and ever equipped for taking exam.
Is there a manner to pass A2010-578 examination at the start strive?
killexams.com tackled utter my troubles. Thinking about lengthy question and answers acquire become a test. Anyways with concise, my making plans for A2010-578 exam changed into truely an agreeable revel in. I correctly passed this exam with 79% marks. It helped me dont forget with out lifting a finger and solace. The Questions & solutions in killexams.com are becoming for derive prepared for this exam. Lots obliged killexams.com on your backing. I should assume about for lengthy simply whilst I used killexams. Motivation and excellent Reinforcement of novices is one theme matter which i discovered arduous however their assist beget it so smooth.
in which can i download A2010-578 ultra-modern dumps?
Id in reality intimate killexams.com to anyone who is giving A2010-578 exam as this not just allows to sweep up the principles within the workbook however moreover gives a super conception approximately the sample of questions. top class assist ..For the A2010-578 exam. Thanks plenty killexams.com team !
CHICAGO, March 1, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- 360Quadrants powered via MarketsandMarkets™, the world's simplest evaluation platform that mixes knowledgeable analysis with crowdsourced insights has launched a quadrant on software modernization functions to advocate companies beget sooner and extra advised selections. the first release of the quadrant has IBM, Fujitsu, and Accenture sharing space as Visionary Leaders. 360Quadrants are generated post analysis of agencies (product portfolios and company approach). Quadrants may breathe up to date every three months, and the position of providers will mirror how patrons, trade consultants, and different providers expense them on different parameters.
50+ businesses offering application modernization features acquire been analyzed of which 31 groups were shortlisted and categorised on a quadrant under Visionary Leaders, Innovators, Dynamic Differentiators, and emerging Leaders.
IBM Cloud Migration factory, Fujitsu world software Modernization, Accenture software portfolio assessment services, Capgemini Collaborative business experience, Tech Mahindra application Modernization, Dell, CGI neighborhood, HCL Legacy Modernization, Avanade, Hexaware technologies, Virtusa, Cognizant swift Mobilization tool, Oracle Modernization service, Wipro, ATOS application Transformation and management, DXC know-how, Yash technologies, Infosys, Syntel, and Micro focus business application Modernization acquire been recognized as visionary leaders as they've based product portfolios and a robust market presence and business strategy.
Bell Integrator Language-to-Language Conversion, Macrosoft Legacy software Modernization, Sensiple, Nous Infosystems, superior desktop software, Asysco B.V., and UST world Legacy Modernization capabilities were identified as innovators as they acquire got focused product portfolios, however a mediocre company strategy.
Astadia and Cyber Infrastructure (P) confined acquire been identified as rising corporations as they've a gap product providing however deplorable company strategy. Idexcel and OSSCube acquire been identified as dynamic differentiators.
The 360Quadrants platform gives essentially the most granular utility modernization features assessment between providers.
The methodology used to rank utility modernization services companies concerned the consume of wide secondary analysis to identify key vendors by course of regarding annual studies, press releases, investor displays, white papers, and quite a few related directories and databases. 31 key companies acquire been shortlisted on the groundwork of their breadth of product choices, organization dimension, and other criteria. The ratings and weights for shortlisted providers against each and every parameter had been finalized post research. After the scores had been finalized, each dealer changed into positioned in respective quadrants based on their score in the product offering and company method parameters.
360Quadrants just about compares organizations in emerging technologies on 6 broad maturities: product maturity, company maturity, use-case maturity, investment maturity, expertise maturity, and enterprise result maturity. every company is reviewed via four stakeholders—patrons, trade consultants, other carriers, and MarketsandMarkets™ analysts—to beget it independent. 360 aims to simplify and de-possibility knotty buy selections. consumers derive to customise their quadrant towards their specific needs. The combined insights from friends, analysts, consultants, and providers reduce the bias and helps the purchaser find the greatest wholesome answer. carriers derive to position themselves to win most efficient current consumers, customize their quadrants, arrive to a conclusion key parameters, and position themselves strategically in a gap space, to breathe consumed by giants and start-usaalike. experts derive to develop their own company and enlarge their thought management. The 360 platform aims the constructing of a social community that hyperlinks trade consultants with corporations worldwide.
360Quadrants has additionally launched quadrants in fields dote Cognitive Analytics solutions, AI in Fintech solutions, and Predictive Analytics application.
MarketsandMarkets™ provides quantified B2B analysis on 30,000 excessive boom niche alternatives/threats so that they can influence the revenues of 70% to 80% of businesses worldwide. MarketsandMarkets™ presently capabilities 7500 shoppers international including eighty% of international Fortune 1000 corporations. practically seventy five,000 properly officers across eight industries global strategy MarketsandMarkets™ for their throe facets around revenues selections.
Contact:Mr. Manoj Singhvimanoj.email@example.comMarketsandMarkets™ research private Ltd.Tower B5, workplace a hundred and one, Magarpatta SEZ,Hadapsar, Pune - 411013, IndiaPhone: +1-888-600-6441
View customary content material:http://www.prnewswire.com/information-releases/ibm-fujitsu-and-accenture-listed-as-visionary-leaders-via-360quadrants-for-software-modernization-300804898.html
Copyright (C) 2019 PR Newswire. utter rights reserved
Onapsis, the international leaders in ERP cybersecurity and compliance, announced IBM safety’s crew of veteran hackers, X-drive crimson, will consume its ERP know-how to advocate companies identify exploitable vulnerabilities of their company-vital applications.
X-drive crimson will consume Onapsis’ ERP expertise when performing vulnerability assessments and penetration testing against SAP and Oracle applications to abet immediately find widely used and unknown vulnerabilities.
clients can access X-force purple’s services during the X-force red Portal, the team’s cloud-based mostly communications and collaboration platform. the usage of the X-drive purple Portal, clients can register for exams and assessments, investigate their popularity, view findings as they are uncovered, view remediation recommendations, and communicate at once with X-force crimson testers, doing away with time-ingesting back and forth and the manual sharing of spreadsheets.
“we are very excited to breathe portion of X-force red’s vulnerability assessment offering. within the physiognomy of explosive growth in attacks to ERP methods, as evidenced with the aid of the USA offshoot of aboriginal land security releasing two essential alerts in the past three years, companies acquire realized they requisite to involve ERP perpetual vulnerability assessment and monitoring into their safety classes. With Onapsis’ patented ERP cybersecurity know-how, combined with X-force purple’s safety advantage and attacker mind-set, businesses can now prerogative away breathe cognizant their security posture, and derive hold of actionable counsel on the course to breathe confident the core of their business is relaxed,” spoke of Mariano Nunez, CEO and Co-founder, Onapsis Inc.
“SAP and Oracle ERP are purposes that many corporations consume for sensitive company tactics,” spoke of Charles Henderson, world accomplice and Head of X-drive purple. “on account of their magnitude and the kind of records they hang, it's captious these functions are scanned and confirmed continuously so that well-known vulnerabilities can too breathe remediated before attackers locate them. Their collaboration with Onapsis will beget that mission arrive to fruition.”
X-force pink gives you vulnerability assessment and protection checking out programs that headquarters of attention on uncovering vulnerabilities throughout purposes, hardware, personnel, internet-connected contraptions, networks, cars, ATMs, blockchain and nearly every thing else.
The group is made out of veteran hackers who apply the identical tools, options, practices and attitude as attackers, uncovering exploitable vulnerabilities that may additionally lead criminals to the topped jewels.
This collaboration additional highlights Onapsis’ expanded effort on growing the international ERP safety associate ecosystem. Onapsis too works closely with the IBM safety features neighborhood for protecting, continuous monitoring, addressing compliance and enabling cloud migrations of one of the world’s greatest agencies.
Harrisburg, NC -- (SBWIRE) -- 01/23/2019 -- international related HEALTHCARE MARKET measurement, reputation AND FORECAST 2019-2025
The record gives a valuable supply of insightful facts for company strategists and competitive analysis of linked Healthcare Market. It provides the linked Healthcare trade overview with boom evaluation and futuristic cost, revenue and many other features. The research analysts provide an intricate description of the cost chain and its distributor analysis. This related Healthcare analyze gives finished facts which reinforces the knowing, scope and utility of this record.
in keeping with the file, global related healthcare market became valued at approximately USD 1,860.26 million in 2017 and is anticipated to generate profits of round USD 10,798.45 million through cessation of 2025, growing at a CAGR of around 27.47% between 2018 and 2025.
The document gifts the market competitive panorama and a corresponding specific evaluation of the principal dealer/key avid gamers available in the market. acquiescent groups within the world related Healthcare Market: Accenture, IBM, SAP, GE Healthcare, Oracle, Microsoft, Airstrip expertise, Medtronic, Allscripts, Boston Scientific, Athenahealth, Cerner, Philips, Agamatrix, Qualcomm, AliveCor and others.
click on the hyperlink to derive a free sample copy of the report:https://www.marketinsightsreports.com/reports/01181057103/international-related-healthcare-market-measurement-reputation-and-forecast-2019-2025/inquiry?source=releasewire&Mode=34
global connected HEALTHCARE MARKET split by course of PRODUCT kind AND applications:
This report segments the global connected Healthcare market on the basis of types are:TelemedicineHome MonitoringAssisted LivingClinical Monitoring
On the foundation of software, the international related Healthcare market is segmented into:prognosis and TreatmentMonitoring ApplicationsEducation and AwarenessWellness and PreventionHealthcare ManagementOthers
REGIONAL evaluation FOR connected HEALTHCARE MARKET:
For complete knowing of market dynamics, the world related Healthcare market is analyzed across key geographies particularly: united states, China, Europe, Japan, South-east Asia, India and others. each and every of these regions is analyzed on foundation of market findings across main nations in these areas for a macro-level figuring out of the market.
have an consequence on OF THE linked HEALTHCARE MARKET document:-complete assessment of utter alternatives and possibility within the connected Healthcare market.- linked Healthcare market recent improvements and principal pursuits.-unique study of company thoughts for enlarge of the related Healthcare market-leading avid gamers.-Conclusive examine in regards to the growth plot of linked Healthcare market for impending years.-In-depth understanding of linked Healthcare market-specific drivers, constraints and predominant micro markets.-beneficial influence internal vital technological and market latest developments outstanding the connected Healthcare market.
The document has one hundred fifty tables and figures browse the record description and TOC:https://www.marketinsightsreports.com/experiences/01181057103/international-related-healthcare-market-size-fame-and-forecast-2019-2025?supply=releasewire&Mode=34
WHAT ARE THE MARKET elements that are defined in the document?
-Key Strategic tendencies: The study too comprises the key strategic traits of the market, comprising R&D, current product launch, M&A, agreements, collaborations, partnerships, joint ventures, and regional boom of the leading competitors working in the market on a world and regional scale.
-Key Market points: The record evaluated key market points, including profits, expense, means, skill utilization rate, gross, production, creation fee, consumption, import/export, provide/demand, charge, market share, CAGR, and Gross margin. additionally, the study presents a complete examine of the key market dynamics and their latest tendencies, together with pertinent market segments and sub-segments.
-Analytical equipment: The world connected Healthcare Market record contains the accurately studied and assessed statistics of the well-known thing trade avid gamers and their scope available in the market by course of means of a number of analytical tools. The analytical apparatus corresponding to Porter's 5 forces analysis, SWOT evaluation, feasibility gape at, and funding recrudesce evaluation were used to analyze the boom of the well-known thing avid gamers operating available in the market.
Customization of the report: This report can breathe customized as per your wants for further data up to 3 businesses or countries or 40 analyst hours.Please connect with their income crew ([email protected]).
ABOUT US:MarketInsightsReports provides syndicated market research on industry verticals together with Healthcare, suggestions and communication know-how (ICT), technology and Media, chemical compounds, substances, energy, cumbersome business, and many others. MarketInsightsReports gives world and regional market intelligence insurance, a 360-diploma market view which comprises statistical forecasts, competitive landscape, special segmentation, key developments, and strategic techniques.
CONTACT US: Irfan Tamboli (Head of revenue) - Market Insights ReportsPhone: + 1704 266 3234 | +ninety one-750-707-8687[email protected] | [email protected]
For more counsel on this press unencumber talk over with: http://www.sbwire.com/press-releases/linked-healthcare-market-2019-highlights-and-fundamentals-accenture-ibm-sap-ge-healthcare-oracle-microsoft-airstrip-technology-medtronic-1129108.htm
Irfan TamboliSales HeadMarket Insights ReportsTelephone: 1-704-266-3234Email: click to electronic mail Irfan TamboliWeb: https://www.marketinsightsreports.com/
Unquestionably it is arduous assignment to pick dependable certification questions/answers assets regarding review, reputation and validity since individuals derive sham because of picking incorrectly benefit. Killexams.com ensure to serve its customers best to its assets concerning exam dumps update and validity. The vast majority of other's sham report dissension customers arrive to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams joyfully and effortlessly. They never trade off on their review, reputation and character on the grounds that killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams customer conviction is imperative to us. Uniquely they deal with killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com sham report objection, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. On the off haphazard that you see any indecent report posted by their rivals with the denomination killexams sham report grievance web, killexams.com sham report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com protest or something dote this, simply recall there are constantly indigent individuals harming reputation of acquiescent administrations because of their advantages. There are a huge number of fulfilled clients that pass their exams utilizing killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams hone questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, their specimen questions and test brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will realize that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.
HPE6-A44 brain dumps | HP0-759 questions answers | HP2-B86 cheat sheets | E20-307 study guide | 9L0-063 study guide | 132-S-916.2 drill questions | 1Z0-161 test questions | 642-995 brain dumps | 9A0-410 dumps | HP0-D08 drill Test | 000-556 braindumps | ST0-116 examcollection | C9510-669 exam questions | JN0-634 braindumps | P2050-005 drill test | 000-969 dump | 310-812 dumps questions | 1Z0-133 free pdf download | 9E0-851 free pdf | 9A0-044 test prep |
Ensure your success with this A2010-578 question bank
We acquire Tested and Approved A2010-578 Exams. killexams.com gives the exact and most recent IT exam materials which practically accommodate utter information focuses. With the sheperd of their A2010-578 exam materials, you dont acquire to squander your opportunity on perusing reference books and simply requisite to singe through 10-20 hours to ace their A2010-578 real questions and answers.
Just proceed through their Questions bank and sense assured approximately the A2010-578 test. You will pass your exam at tall marks or your money back. They acquire aggregated a database of A2010-578 Dumps from actual test so that you can arrive up with a haphazard to derive ready and pass A2010-578 exam on the well-known enterprise. Simply install their Exam Simulator and derive ready. You will pass the exam.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as beneath;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for utter tests on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders more than $99
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for utter Orders
Detail is at http://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/A2010-578
if you are searching for Pass4sure A2010-578 drill Test containing real Test Questions, you are at pattern place. They acquire assembled database of questions from Actual Exams with a specific cessation goal to enable you to procedure and pass your exam on the first attempt. utter preparation materials on the site are Up To Date and verified by their specialists.
We give latest and updated Pass4sure drill Test with Actual Exam Questions and Answers for current syllabus of IBM A2010-578 Exam. drill their real Questions and Answers to better your insight and pass your exam with tall Marks. They guarantee your achievement in the Test Center, covering every one of the points of exam and construct your knowledge of the A2010-578 exam. Pass 4 beyond any doubt with their precise questions.
killexams.com A2010-578 Exam PDF contains Complete Pool of Questions and Answers and Dumps verified and certified including references and clarifications (where material). Their objective to assemble the Questions and Answers isn't just to pass the exam at first attempt however Really better Your knowledge about the A2010-578 exam themes.
A2010-578 exam Questions and Answers are Printable in tall character Study sheperd that you can download in your Computer or some other gadget and launch setting up your A2010-578 exam. Print Complete A2010-578 Study Guide, convey with you when you are at Vacations or Traveling and indulge in your Exam Prep. You can derive to updated A2010-578 Exam braindumps from your online record whenever.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for utter exams on website
PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for utter Orders
A2010-578 Practice Test | A2010-578 examcollection | A2010-578 VCE | A2010-578 study guide | A2010-578 practice exam | A2010-578 cram
Killexams C2070-448 exam questions | Killexams 301b cheat sheets | Killexams HP0-M37 brain dumps | Killexams CLAD drill test | Killexams 000-376 braindumps | Killexams 1Z0-497 questions and answers | Killexams 190-840 exam prep | Killexams 920-165 test prep | Killexams ACF-CCP free pdf | Killexams HP0-Y49 mock exam | Killexams 156-915.77 examcollection | Killexams 300-365 brain dumps | Killexams 642-731 study guide | Killexams 000-582 VCE | Killexams M9560-727 pdf download | Killexams M2040-671 sample test | Killexams 9L0-064 dumps questions | Killexams P2090-032 drill test | Killexams CGFNS study guide | Killexams 212-77 drill questions |
Killexams P2180-039 dumps questions | Killexams 000-455 brain dumps | Killexams 190-738 questions and answers | Killexams 70-569-CSharp braindumps | Killexams HP2-E57 pdf download | Killexams 000-Z01 exam questions | Killexams 000-N33 real questions | Killexams P2050-028 drill questions | Killexams 000-787 questions answers | Killexams 000-083 drill Test | Killexams 4A0-106 real questions | Killexams 9L0-407 dumps | Killexams 920-245 drill test | Killexams GMAT free pdf download | Killexams ITEC-Massage braindumps | Killexams C2010-940 braindumps | Killexams 3104 dump | Killexams 642-885 exam prep | Killexams 00M-640 test questions | Killexams MBLEX drill exam |
Citrix is a cloud-computing company that offers solutions for mobility, desktop virtualization, cloud networking, cloud platforms, collaboration and data sharing that enable users to labor securely from anywhere on a variety of devices. The company's products descend into five main categories: secure digital workspace, app virtualization and VDI, Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM), file sync and sharing, and networking. celebrated Citrix products involve XenApp, XenDesktop, XenMobile, NetScaler and ShareFile. More than 400,000 organizations and more than 100 million users dash Citrix XenApp and XenDesktop products globally.
Citrix Systems started in 1989 and is headquartered in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Today, the company offers a number of professional certifications that are recognized globally.Citrix Certification Program Overview
Citrix certifications are solutions-based to reflect the needs of organizations and IT professionals. The three main Citrix certification topic areas are Desktop Virtualization, Networking and Enterprise Mobility Management. Citrix too offers credentials for Enterprise File Synchronization and Sharing. Last, but not least, Citrix Cloud certifications were introduced in 2018.
Within the virtualization, networking and mobility certification topic areas, Citrix credentials are available at associate, professional and expert levels. These levels reflect the skills, knowledge and tang required of professionals who deserve such Citrix certifications. Associate-level exams typically cost $200, whereas professional- and expert-level exams cost $300.
Here’s a summary of current certifications available from Citrix:
The Citrix Certified Associate – Virtualization (CCA-V) certification is for operators and administrators proficient in installing, configuring, managing, maintaining, monitoring and troubleshooting XenApp and XenDesktop 7.15 solutions. There are no prereqs, but you must pass exam 1Y0-203 to deserve this certification.
The Citrix XenApp and XenDesktop 7.15 Administration exam (1Y0-203) covers 14 topics including an architectural overview, installation, provisioning, access, configuring, securing, monitoring, troubleshooting and more in a XenApp and XenDesktop 7.15 environment.CCP-V: Citrix Certified Professional – Virtualization
The Citrix Certified Professional – Virtualization (CCP-V) certification is for engineers and consultants who manage and advocate knotty XenApp and XenDesktop 7.15 provisioning environments and solutions. To deserve the CCP-V certification, you must acquire attained CCA-V certification and pass exam 1Y0-311.
The Citrix XenApp and XenDesktop 7.15 LTSR Advanced Administrator exam (1Y0-311) covers 14 topics including advanced architecture, Virtual Desktop Agents (VDA), HDX and multimedia, provisioning (infrastructure, services, integrating and supporting), layering, vDisk streaming and more.CCE-V: Citrix Certified Expert – Virtualization
The Citrix Certified Expert – Virtualization (CCE-V) certification is geared toward solution designers who may breathe architects, engineers or consultants, and who assess and design comprehensive XenApp and XenDesktop 7.15 or XenDesktop 7.6 solutions. To deserve the CCE-V certification you must acquire already earned the CCA-V and CCP-V certifications and pass either of the 1Y0-402 or 1Y0-401 exams.
The Designing Citrix XenDesktop 7.6 Solutions Exam (1Y0-401) is divided into six sections, which cover designing and documenting infrastructure and security infrastructure, designing integrated virtualization solutions, analyzing existing environments, conducting planning and risk assessments, and assessing existing environments. The Citrix XenApp and XenDesktop 7.15 Assessment, Design and Advanced Configurations exam (1Y0-402) covers 11 topics including design methodology, cataclysm recovery, tall availability, access and security, store and resource design and more.
Citrix Certified Associate – Virtualization (CCA-V)
Citrix XenApp and XenDesktop 7.15 Administration (1Y0-203)
Citrix Certified Professional – Virtualization (CCP-V)
Citrix XenApp and XenDesktop 7.15 LTSR Advanced Administrator (1Y0-311)
Citrix Certified Expert – Virtualization (CCE-V)
Designing Citrix XenDesktop 7.6 Solutions (1Y0-401)
Citrix XenApp and XenDesktop 7.15 Assessment, Design and Advanced Configurations (1Y0-402)Citrix Virtualization Certification Ladder
Citrix's Virtualization certifications build upon one another. Once you deserve the Citrix Certified Associate (CCA-V) certification (exam 1Y0-203), you can hold the Citrix Certified Professional (CCP-V) exam (1Y0-311). Once you've passed that exam, you can hold either Citrix Certified Expert (CCE-V) exam: (1Y0-401) or (1Y0-402).
These Virtualization certifications are cogent for three years from the date you obtain them. If a current exam is released during this time, you must pass the latest exam for your plane before the previous exam’s expiration date to maintain certification currency.Citrix Networking Certifications CCA-N: Citrix Certified Associate – Networking
If you're a network or systems administrator who is an expert in app and desktop virtualization, and you want to expand your expertise to include NetScaler Gateway 12 for data, app and desktop solutions, the Citrix Certified Associate - Networking (CCA-N) certification is for you. Training is for administrators who acquire limited or no previous NetScaler experience.
You must pass either the Citrix NetScaler 12 Essentials and Unified Gateway (1Y0-230) or Citrix NetScaler 12 Essentials and Traffic Management (1Y0-240) exam to deserve the credential. Exam 1Y0-230 targets basic networking, Unified Gateway (including configuration), integration, managing client connections, load balancing, NetScaler platforms, AppExpert Expressions and policies, SSL offload, authentication and security. Exam 1Y0-240 covers basic networking, NetScaler platforms, tall availability, load balancing, SSL offing, security, troubleshooting, default policies, URL transformation, switching, optimization and load balancing for global servers.CCP-N: Citrix Certified Professional – Networking
The Citrix Certified Professional - Networking (CCP-N) certification is aimed toward network engineers and people with some networking tang who implement, manage and optimize Citrix NetScaler Application Firewall in Citrix NetScalrer 12 environments, manage and optimize NetScaler application traffic, and manage NetScaler environments using NetScaler Management and Analytics System (NMAS).
The five-day training Citrix NetScaler 12.x Advanced Topics – Security, Management and Optimization (CNS-320) will abet you consequence just that. It's for individuals with some understanding of NetScaler Essentials, traffic management and Unified Gateway.
In addition to earning the CCA-N, you must pass the Citrix NetScaler Advanced Topics – Security, Management and Optimization (1Y0-304) exam to achieve the CCP-N certification. The exam targets firewalls, expressions, attacks, optimization (tuning and front-end), caching, monitoring and troubleshooting, monitoring and managing NetScaler configurations, instances and weblogging.Citrix NetScaler SD-WAN Certified (CC-SDWAN)
The newest addition to the Citrix cert portfolio is the Citrix NetScaler SD-WAN (CC-SDWAN), which is for professionals who configure the technology and better its performance and reliability.
To prepare for the credential, Citrix offers a four-module NetScaler SD-WAN hands-on workshop training course. Candidates must pass an exam at the cessation of each module with a score of 80 percent or higher. The modules are SD-WAN Overview, SD-WAN Architecture, SD-WAN character of Service, and SD-WAN Deployment Modes and Configuration. Additional modules that focus on SD-WAN 9.0, 9.1 and 9.2 features are included in the training. Citrix awards the certification only after passing utter modules.
Citrix Certified Associate – Networking (CCA-N)
Citrix NetScaler 12 Essentials and Unified Gateway (1Y0-230)
Citrix NetScaler 12 Essentials and Traffic Management (1Y0-240)
Citrix Certified Professional – Networking (CCP-N)
Citrix NetScaler Advanced Topics – Security, Management and Optimization (1Y0-304)
Citrix NetScaler SD-WAN Certified (CC-SDWAN)
Four exams at the cessation of each NetScaler SD-WAN training moduleCitrix Networking Certification Ladder
Candidates interested in a Citrix networking career should first obtain the CCA-N credential. From there, candidates will lope to the CCP-N (which takes the CCA-N as a prerequisite). Candidates interested in pursuing a career path in NetScaler SD-WAN should pursue the CC-SDWAN credential. utter networking credentials are cogent for three years, after which you must recertify by passing the then-current exam or attending an instructor-led training course.Citrix Mobility Certifications CCP-M: Citrix Certified Professional – Mobility
Mobility is a relatively current certification category for Citrix. Of the three workable credential levels, only the professional certification is currently live. (Associate and expert certifications for mobility are soundless in development.) The Citrix Certified Professional – Mobility (CCP-M) certification is aimed at mobile designers and developers. Such professionals must breathe confidential with designing, installing, configuring and managing a Citrix XenMobile Enterprise solution, including mobile device management, mobile application management and secure productivity.
To obtain the CCP-M certification you must pass exam Designing, Deploying, and Managing Citrix XenMobile 10 Enterprise Solutions (1Y0-371) exam. The exam covers four areas: designing, installing, configuring and managing components of solutions using XenMobile 10 Enterprise.Enterprise File Synchronization and Sharing Citrix ShareFile Certified (CC-SHAREFILE)
The Citrix ShareFile Certified (CC-SHAREFILE) credential targets Enterprise File Sync and Sharing (EFSS) solution professionals who manage corporate data sharing, access, synchronization and security using Citrix ShareFile solutions.
To deserve the CC-SHAREFILE designation, candidates must complete the ShareFile Foundations training course and pass each module exam with a score of 80 percent or higher. The ShareFile Foundations course contains six modules: Getting Started with ShareFile, Management and Administration, Securing a ShareFile Deployment, Exploring the cessation User Experience, Supporting a ShareFile Deployment, and ShareFile Deployment Demos.Citrix Cloud Services Certifications
Introduced in 2018, the Citrix Cloud Services certifications are the newest addition to the Citrix certification portfolio. Citrix offers two Citrix Cloud Services credentials: the XenApp and XenDesktop Service on Citrix Cloud Certified (CC-XAD-CC) and XenApp and XenDesktop Service Integration with Microsoft Azure Certified (CC-XAD-MA).XenApp and XenDesktop Service on Citrix Cloud Certified (CC-XAD-CC)
The Citrix Cloud Certified (CC-XAD-CC) credential targets professionals who consume XenApp and XenDesktop Service to deliver apps and desktops using the Citrix Cloud platform. To deserve the CC-XAD-CC, candidates must hold one of the following training courses: Moving to the XenApp and XenDesktop Service on Citrix Cloud and Microsoft Azure (CXD-252) or poignant to the XenApp and XenDesktop Service on Citrix Cloud (CXD-250).XenApp and XenDesktop Service Integration with Microsoft Azure Certified (CC-XAD-MA)
The XenApp and XenDesktop Service Integration with Microsoft Azure Certified credential is focused on professionals who integrate and deliver XenApp and XenDesktop Service desktop and apps to Microsoft Azure. To deserve the designation, candidates must hold either the poignant to the XenApp and XenDesktop Service on Citrix Cloud and Microsoft Azure (CXD-252) or the Citrix XenApp and XenDesktop Service on Microsoft Azure (CXD-251) training course.
Exam release dates acquire not yet been announced but interested candidates may deserve the credentials by taking the associated recommended training course.Required Exams
XenApp and XenDesktop Service on Citrix Cloud Certified (CC-XAD-CC)
Attend one of the following training courses:
Moving to the XenApp and XenDesktop Service on Citrix Cloud and Microsoft Azure (CXD-252)
Moving to the XenApp and XenDesktop Service on Citrix Cloud (CXD-250
XenApp and XenDesktop Service Integration with Microsoft Azure Certified (CC-XAD-MA)
Attend one of the following training courses:
Moving to the XenApp and XenDesktop Service on Citrix Cloud and Microsoft Azure (CXD-252)
Citrix XenApp and XenDesktop Service on Microsoft Azure (CXD-251)Related Jobs and Training
Citrix careers watch to concentrate on their respective certification focus areas, namely, virtualization, networking and mobility. While Citrix professionals may breathe organize in a variety of roles, they are most often known for their contributions as designers, architects, engineers and system administrators. You’ll too find Citrix certified professionals employed across utter industry sectors.
A simple search on SimplyHired.com (a celebrated job search board) organize the following:
We too organize a plethora of employers seeking engineering pros, including Citrix engineers for desktop services, data center, systems, solutions, managed services, virtualization, operations, converged infrastructure and VDI. Other common roles involve managers, analysts, operators, infrastructure specialists, architects (cloud solutions, infrastructure and virtualization architects) and mobile designers.
Citrix offers a variety of online resources to abet you achieve your desired certification. Start by reviewing the site for each certification. You'll find helpful links to exam prep guides, as well as instructor-led training locations, virtual instructor-led courses and eLearning through Citrix Education. While not required, training is highly recommended. Also, check out Citrix's education blogs for up-to-date information on exam developments.
The most valuable resources for the exams are Citrix exam prep guides. They accommodate sample questions, percentage weightings of major domains covered in each exam, objectives, extra resources and more.
Urban transportation systems are vulnerable to congestion, accidents, weather, special events, and other costly delays. Whereas typical policy responses prioritize reduction of delays under timehonored conditions to better the efficiency of urban road systems, analytic advocate for investments that better resilience (defined as system recovery from additional disruptions) is soundless scarce. In this effort, they picture paved roads as a transportation network by mapping intersections to nodes and road segments between the intersections to links. They built road networks for 40 of the urban areas defined by the U.S. Census Bureau. They developed and calibrated a model to evaluate traffic delays using link loads. The loads may breathe regarded as traffic-based centrality measures, estimating the number of individuals using corresponding road segments. Efficiency was estimated as the average annual retard per peak-period auto commuter, and modeled results were organize to breathe proximate to observed data, with the notable exception of current York City. Resilience was estimated as the change in efficiency resulting from roadway disruptions and was organize to vary between cities, with increased delays due to a 5% random loss of road linkages ranging from 9.5% in Los Angeles to 56.0% in San Francisco. The results demonstrate that many urban road systems that operate inefficiently under timehonored conditions are nevertheless resilient to disruption, whereas some more efficient cities are more fragile. The implication is that resilience, not just efficiency, should breathe considered explicitly in roadway project selection and justify investment opportunities related to cataclysm and other disruptions.INTRODUCTION
Existing roadway design standards emphasize the efficient movement of vehicles through a transportation network (1–4). Efficiency in this context may involve identification of the shortest or fastest route (1, 5–7), or the route that minimizes congestion (8). It is the primary criterion on which road networks are modeled and design alternatives are considered (6, 7, 9, 10). The Texas A&M Transportation Institute defines and reports traffic retard in urban areas as the annual retard per auto commuter (11). Other studies define efficiency as retard for the individual driver in terms of time spent poignant or stopped (7), or express travel time between utter origin-destination pairs in the network (9). However, as the tang of any motorist in great American cities can attest, conditions beyond the scope of the roadway design, including congestion, accidents, deplorable weather, construction, and special events (for example, a marathon race), can antecedent costly delays and frustrating inefficiencies that result in fuel waste, infrastructure deterioration, and increased pollution (12, 13). Evaluating road networks based only on efficiency under timehonored operating conditions results in cramped to no information about how the system performs under suboptimal or disrupted conditions.
Infrastructure systems that exhibit adaptive response to stress are typically characterized as resilient (14–21). Given the essential role of transportation in emergency response, provision of essential services, and economic well-being, the resilience of roadway networks has received increasing policy attention. Nonetheless, scholars acquire yet to converge on a shared understanding of resilience suitable to sheperd design, operation, and reconstruction of roadway networks. Although resilience in infrastructure systems is characterized as a multidimensional concept (22, 23), in many engineering and civil infrastructure implementations, resilience is defined as the talent of a system to prepare for, absorb, recoup from, and fitting to disturbances (16). Specific to transportation, resilience has been defined as “the talent of the system to maintain its demonstrated plane of service or to restore itself to that plane of service in a specified timeframe” (24). Others relate transportation resilience as simply the talent of a system to minimize operational loss (25) or consume the term synonymously with robustness, redundancy, reliability, or vulnerability (26–28).
Current efforts in transportation resilience research acquire focused on framework development and quantification methods. These efforts involve the specification of resilience indicators, such as total traffic retard (24), economic loss (29), post-disaster maximum stream (30), and autonomous system components (31). Practical concerns with this kind of resilience evaluation are that it relies on uncertain performance data and often omits indicators that are unquantifiable (19). Other resilience approaches apply traffic network modeling to identify locations for captious buildings (for example, hospitals and fire stations) (32), minimize trip distance for individual passengers (33), and minimize travel time across the system (12). One drawback of existing network resilience methods is that they are data-intensive, often requiring limited information about resources for unusual road system repair (26, 28) or network deportment following a disruptive event (34). Moreover, existing resilience quantification approaches want calibration and testing across a compass of transportation systems. Because many disruptive events, and their associated consequences, are difficult to predict, resilient road systems must breathe characterized and evaluated by the capacity to fitting to a variety of different stress scenarios. Partly because of these obstacles, joint consideration of efficiency and resilience has yet to breathe implemented for transportation networks.
Here, they study the interconnections between resilience and efficiency (20) among road transportation networks in 40 major U.S. cities. They develop an urban roadway efficiency model, calibrate it on the basis of the observed data (11) of annual retard per peak-period auto commuter, and apply the model to cipher efficiency in 40 cities. Then, they model traffic response to random roadway disruptions and recalculate expected delays to determine the sensitivity of each city to loss of roadway linkages. The results may disclose well-known considerations for assessing proposals for improvement of roadway infrastructure that maintain efficiency under stress conditions.METHODS
The Methods section appears here to abet clarify the subsequent sections. To develop the urban roadway efficiency model, they defined the urban zone boundaries, constructed the road networks, and evaluated the population density within cities using the Census Bureau data sets (35, 36) and OpenStreetMap (OSM) data sets (37). They relied on these data to assess commuter patterns, which they used to measure efficiency and resilience of road networks.
Alternative approaches to transportation acquire been offered and involve those based on percolation theory and cascading failures (38–40), human mobility pattern studies (41–43), queueing (44, 45), and the consume of historical data to prognosticate traffic. They review these approaches in the Supplementary Materials and note that the main benefit of their model is that it relies solely on readily available public data, rather than on particular data sets that may or may not breathe practical to obtain for any particular region. The model’s algorithmic simplicity allows us to account spatial topologies of cities in tall resolution including tens of thousands of nodes and links. They did not create a more accurate transportation model than the existing ones, but they were able to obtain measurable characteristics of transportation systems (average delays) using their model.Geospatial boundaries and population density
To define geospatial boundaries for the transportation infrastructure networks, they used the U.S. Census Bureau geospatial data set (35) for urban areas—densely developed residential, commercial, and other nonresidential areas (46). They approximated the exact urban zone polygon with a simplified manually drawn one (Fig. 1A) and included utter roadways within 40 km (25 miles) of it in the network. For each of the links, they calculated its length on the basis of the polyline defining the link and assigned a number of lanes m and the FFSs (see the Supplementary Materials).Fig. 1 Definition of urban areas and assignment of nodes’ population.
(A) Boston, MA-NH-RI urban zone as defined by the U.S. Census Bureau shapefiles (gray background). To simplify the model and the algorithms calculating the distance from network nodes to the city boundary, they approximate each of the urban areas shapefiles with a ribald manually drawn polygon (pink outline). (B) Assignment of the number of people departing from each of the network nodes. Population distribution (color polygons; red corresponds to higher population density), Voronoi polygons (black outline), and network nodes (dots) in Downtown Boston.
We next estimated population in vicinity of each intersection i using the Census Tract data (36). To this end, they split the map into Voronoi cells centered at intersections and then evaluated the population of each cell Ni as
Above, Nt is the population of Census Tract t, and Pi and Pt are the polygons of the cell and the tract, respectively (Fig. 1B and table S2).Transportation model
We built on the gravity model to generate commuting patterns. The gravity model (47) is a classical model for trip distribution assignment and is extensively adopted in most metropolitan planning and statewide travel require models in the United States (48–51). Other trip distribution models include, for example, destination election models (52, 53). However, these models are not as widely used in great scale, because the minute data required by these models are frequently unavailable (48).
We assumed that (i) the stream of commuters from origin region o to destination region d is proportional to the population at the destination Nd and that (ii) the stream of commuters depends on the distance xod between the origin and destination and is given by a distance factor, P(xod). Using these assumptions, they assessed the fraction of individuals commuting from region o to destination region d, fod, as
Then, the commuter stream from origin region o to destination region d is
Although individual driving habits may vary (54), they assumed that utter drivers tended to optimize their commute paths such that their travel time was minimized. This assumption allowed us to cipher commute paths for every origin-destination pair using inferred FFSs. To cipher commuter flows between utter pairs of intersections, they estimated distances xod as the distance of the shortest time path from o to d. Furthermore, in residence of the distance factor P(xod), they used the distribution of trip lengths from the U.S. Federal Highway Administration National Household Travel Survey (55, 56), which they approximated with the exponential role (Fig. 2A and table S3).Fig. 2 Model details.
(A) Distance factor P(xod) (Eq. 2) of trips given the distance between nodes (solid line) and the statistical data (bars). (B) Dependency of hasten on density for V = 100 km/hour.
Next, they defined the commuter load on each road segment as
(4)where θod(ij) is a binary variable equal to 0 when the link ij is not on the shortest path connecting nodes o and d, and 1 otherwise. Note that in Eq. 4, they only considered origins that were not farther than 30 km from the urban zone border polygon. The nodes farther than 30 km from the border were only used as destinations to evaluate the fraction of commuters not going toward the urban zone (Eq. 2).
Because most commuters travel during peak periods, commuter loads Lij can breathe regarded as traffic-based centrality measures estimating the number of individuals using corresponding road segments. Then, the cumulative time lost by utter commuters is
(5)where Vij and vij are, respectively, the FFS and the actual traffic hasten along the ij road segment, lij is its length, l0 is the length correction due to traffic signals, and β is the proportionality coefficient identical for utter urban areas. The summation in Eq. 5 includes only links, whose origins and destinations are within the border polygon. A similar equation was obtained for the poignant retard in the study of Jiang and Adeli (45), where the authors looked at the retard induced from road repairs.
The actual traffic hasten vij depends on many factors including the hasten limit, the number of drivers on the road, and road conditions. Although there exist a number of approaches to appraise actual traffic hasten (57, 58), they chose to consume the Daganzo model (59) to derive the traffic speed, as shown in the Supplementary Materials
(6)where vmin is the minimum hasten in the traffic, vveh is the correction for the finite size of the car, and α is the proportionality coefficient (Fig. 2B). Efficiency and resilience metrics
We measured efficiency as the average annual retard per peak-period auto commuter. In practice, lower retard means higher efficiency. There are multiple ways to map from delays to efficiency, such as taking the inverse values of delays, taking negative values of delays, etc. To avoid ambiguity and facilitate the interpretation of results, they used the delays themselves to quantify the transportation efficiency of urban areas.
We operationalized resilience through the change in traffic delays relative to stress, which is modeled as loss or impairment of roadway linkages. Looking at resilience from the network science perspective, they focused on topological features of cities, rather than on recovery resources available. Sterbenz et al. (60) evaluated a network’s resilience as a compass of operational conditions for which it stays in the acceptable service region and highlighted that remediation mechanisms drive the operational condition toward improvement. They are studying how availability of alternate routes helps remediate the consequences of the initial disruption to the network. In the traffic context, the immediate impact of a given physical disruption (and the time for it to unfold) in terms of closing lanes or reducing hasten limits on affected roads will not vary much from network to network, although the number and kind of these disruptions will. Likewise, the hasten of restoring complete functionality (through action in the physical domain) is not so much contingent on the road network as it is on the nature of the disruption (snow versus earthquake versus flood) and the resources that the city allocates to such repair. The plane of functionality that these repairs achieve ought to breathe the complete predisruption functionality, that is, eventually utter roads can breathe fully cleared or restored. However, the immediate loss of role for a given traffic stream can very quickly breathe partially recovered after a disruption by action in the information domain, namely, rerouting of traffic. From the current constant condition at that plane of functionality, complete functionality is gradually restored. Thus, their model proxies for resilience and is calibrated against the data that proxy for efficiency. At the identical time, they note that to fully capture resilience characteristics of a transportation system, it is required to analyze recovery resources available and the effectiveness of coordination between the relevant authorities. Lower additional retard corresponds to higher resilience, but using the identical reasoning that they had for efficiency, they quantified resilience through additional delays.RESULTS Efficiency
Together, their traffic model has three parameters (proportionality coefficient α, minimum hasten vmin, and finite vehicle size correction vveh) and is summarized in Eqs. 5 and 6. Given parameter values of the model, one can appraise the total retard incurred by utter commuters in any given suburban zone or, equivalently, the average retard per commuter. They hold vveh = 9 km/hour and vmin = 5 km/hour and calibrate the model to determine the value of α to match the real data on the annual average retard per peak-period auto commuter provided by the Urban Mobility Scorecard (11).
We divide the 40 urban areas into two equally sized groups for model calibration and validation, respectively. They acquire organize that for the 20 urban areas used for calibration, the R-squared coefficient took values in the compass (−0.01 to 0.83) (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Materials). This allows us to set model parameters α and β (see Methods) as follows: α = 4.30 × 104 hour−1 and β = 10.59. These values correspond to the Pearson coefficient of 0.91 (P = 2.17 × 10−8).Fig. 3 Modeled and observed delays in 40 urban areas.
Pearson correlation coefficients and P values between observed and modeled delays are (0.91, 2.17 × 10−8) for the 20 cities used to calibrate the model and (0.63, 3.00 × 10−3) for the 20 cities used to validate the model. Observed delays were taken from the Texas A&M Transportation Institute Urban Mobility Scorecard (11).
To validate the model, they appraise travel delays in 20 different urban areas. As seen from Fig. 3, the estimated travel delays are significantly correlated (R = 0.63, P = 3.00 × 10−3) with actual retard times (11), validating the transportation model. device 4 is a Google Maps representation of real and modeled results for Los Angeles and San Francisco. Road conditions under real, average traffic patterns at 8 a.m. provided by Google Maps are in Fig. 4 (A and D). Modeled conditions are given for comparison in Fig. 4 (B and E). Finally, Fig. 4 (C and F) shows the new, modeled traffic patterns that result from redistribution of travel in response to a disruption of 5% of the links.Fig. 4 Traffic distributions.
Typical congestion at 8 a.m. for Los Angeles (top) and San Francisco (bottom) as given by Google Maps (A and D), modeled with no disruptions (B and E), and modeled with a 5% link disruption (C and F). Notably, in Los Angeles, the disruption results in traffic redistribution to smaller roads, whereas in San Francisco, it results in increased congestion along the major highways.Resilience
Our approach to model stress is inspired by percolation theory. For every independent simulation of stress, they select a finite fraction of affected road segments r at random, with the probability of failure proportional to segment length. They collect statistics for 20 realizations of the percolation. On failed segments, free-flow speeds (FFSs) are reduced to 1 km/hour (representing near-total loss), and loads L and traffic delays are then recalculated using the updated FFSs. Low-stress scenarios (r < 0.1) might breathe caused by accidents or construction. Larger disruptions might occur during power failures that disrupt traffic signals or severe flooding that makes many roadways nearly impassable. Finally, widespread stress might breathe caused by snow, ice, or dust storms that affect nearly the entire roadway system. device 5 displays the analysis of retard times in six representative urban areas for the complete spectrum of adverse event severities, r ⋲ [0; 1]. In addition, fig. S5 shows the results for utter urban areas. Some routes within a single urban zone tang longer delays than others. The inset of Fig. 5 shows the retard distribution for both Los Angeles, which is narrowly clustered, and Boston, where greater variability between roadways is evident. Traffic retard times grow rapidly as r increases and attain saturation (all routes poignant at 1 km/hour) as r approaches 1. They determine the most resilient urban transportation network to breathe Salt Lake City, UT, whereas the least resilient among the 40 metropolitans is shown to breathe Washington, DC.Fig. 5 Dependency of the additional retard on the severity of the links disruption for six representative urban areas.
Error bars present express values ± SD. The inset shows distribution densities for two selected urban areas for 1000 realizations of 5% disruption. Note that San Francisco’s unique topology makes it susceptible to failures of a minute number of discrete roadways, and this produces an anomalous impact at 5 to 15% disruption.
Figure 6 shows both the efficiency (in blue) and resilience response (additional delays due to 5% link disruption, in orange) for the 40 urban areas modeled. Some cities with tall efficiency under timehonored operating conditions (that is, low delays) nevertheless exhibit low resilience (that is, a keen enlarge in traffic delays) under stress. Virginia Beach, VA; Providence, RI; and Jacksonville, FL utter descend into this category of urban areas in which traffic operates well under ordinary circumstances but rapidly become snarled under mild stress. On the other hand, Los Angeles is notorious for traffic delays under utter conditions—yet minor stress levels result in cramped degradation of efficiency. By contrast, timehonored traffic delays in San Francisco are comparable to Los Angeles, but mild stress in San Francisco results in great increases in additional delays. These examples bespeak that resilience (that is, additional retard response to stress) is independent of timehonored operating efficiency.Fig. 6 Comparison of resilience and efficiency metrics.
Annual impact of 5% disruption (additional delay) has a low correlation with timehonored annual retard per peak-period auto commuter (delay). Pearson R = 0.49, P = 1.18 × 10−3.DISCUSSION
The disturbances affecting the road infrastructure are often complex, and their impact on the structure and role of roadway systems may breathe unknown (28, 31). These disturbances might breathe natural and irregular, such as distributed road closures caused by an earthquake or homogeneous vehicle slowing down because of a snowstorm. The disturbances might too breathe anthropogenic and intentional, such as a street impartial or marathon race. Whatever the disturbance, the results of this analysis allow several meaningful inferences to breathe made that may acquire well-known implications for highway transportation policy. The first is that resilience and efficiency picture different aspects related to the nature of transportation systems; they are not correlated and should breathe considered jointly as complementary characteristics of roadway networks.
Second, there are characteristic differences in the resilience of different urban areas, and these differences are persistent at mild, medium, or widespread levels of stress (Fig. 5). Except for San Francisco, CA, which is the most breakable of utter cities represented in Fig. 5 at stress levels r < 20% but then surpassed by Boston, MA and Washington, DC, the rank ordering of urban zone resilience is insensitive to stress levels. That is, cities that exhibit relatively low resilience under mild stress are the identical cities that exhibit low levels of resilience (relative to peers) under widespread roadway impairment. This suggests that the characteristics that impart resilience (such as availability or alternate routes through redundancy of links) are protective against both the intermittent outages caused by occasional car crashes and those caused by snow and ice storms. For cities without resilience, a widespread hazard such as snow may lead to a cascade of conditions (for example, crashes) that rapidly deteriorate into gridlock. This was exactly the case for Washington, DC 20 January 2016 under only 2.5 × 10−2 m or 2.5 cm of snow (61), and for Atlanta, GA 2 years earlier, which experienced 5.1 × 10−2 m or 5.1 cm of snow in the middle of the day that resulted in traffic jams that took days to disentangle (62). Whereas celebrated explanations of these traffic catastrophes focus on the failure of roadway managers to prepare plows and emergency response equipment, Fig. 5 suggests that cities with similar climates (Memphis, TN and Richmond, VA) are less likely to breathe affected, regardless of the availability of plow or sand trucks.
The third inference follows from Fig. 6, which suggests that urban areas that beget capital investments to reduce traffic delays under timehonored operating conditions may nevertheless breathe vulnerable to traffic delays under mild stress conditions. Because these stressors are inevitable, whether from crashes, construction, special events, extreme weather, apparatus malfunctions, or even deliberate attack, investment strategies that prioritize reduction of timehonored operating delays may acquire the unintended consequence of exacerbating tail risks—that is, the risk of worse catastrophe under unlikely but workable conditions.
Finally, the exceptional position of current York City in Fig. 3 calls attention to the fact that substitutes for roadway transportation are available in many cities and acquire an well-known role to play in relieving traffic congestion. According to the Texas A&M Institute (63, 64), public transit reduces delays per peak-period auto commuter in the current York urban zone by 63 hours, in Chicago by 23 hours, and by less than 20 hours in other urban areas. Because their model considers only roadway transit, and current York City contains a myriad of nonroad-based options to avoid roadway congestion, it is unlikely that their model can provide informative results for the current York urban area.
Although interest has increased in policies that enhance roadway resilience, few analytic tools are available to sheperd current investments in achieving resilience goals. It is widely understood that roadway infrastructure is expensive, both in acquiring land for rights-of-way and in construction of improvements, and thus, decisions regarding alignment, crossing, and access made over a age of decades may acquire long-lasting consequences that are observable in traffic data today. Consequently, urban areas exhibit different unintentional traffic characteristics, including delays under timehonored and random stress conditions. Investments motivated exclusively by expected efficiencies under timehonored operating conditions are unreliable safeguards against loss of efficiency under stress conditions. Therefore, current analytic tools are required that allow designers to assess the adaptive capacity of roadway infrastructure and assess the potential of current investments to provide enhanced resilience. The adaptive network-based model described herein is one such approach.SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
Supplementary material for this article is available at http://advances.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/3/12/e1701079/DC1
Alternative approaches to model transportation
Mapping from OSM Foundation shapefiles to network nodes and links
Population assignment algorithm
Distance factor of the likelihood of travel between nodes
Estimation of the traffic hasten from the density of vehicles
Model calibration procedure
Sensitivity of the model to ramp speeds
Additional retard as a role of the severity of link disruption
table S1. Mapping original OSM types to network link types and assignment of the number of lanes.
table S2. The algorithm of the node population assignment.
table S3. Distance factor P(xod) of the likelihood of travel between nodes.
table S4. Model sensitivity to ramp hasten coefficient.
fig. S1. Effects of the removal of nodes of degree 2.
fig. S2. Density-flow relationship in the Daganzo traffic model.
fig. S3. Model calibration.
fig. S4. Modeled delays for ramp hasten coefficients of 1/3 and 1/2.
fig. S5. Dependency of the additional retard on the severity of the link disruption for utter 40 urban areas.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant consume is not for commercial advantage and provided the original labor is properly cited.REFERENCES AND NOTES
K. Beverly, Efficient consume of Highway Capacity (FHWA-HOP-10-023, Texas Transportation Institute, 2010), p. 100.
T. Yamashita, K. Izumi, K. Kurumatani, Car navigation with route information sharing for improvement of traffic efficiency, in Proceedings of the 7th International IEEE Conference on quick-witted Transportation Systems (IEEE, 2004), pp. 465–470.
K. Turnbull, Technical Activities Division, Transportation Research Board, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Transportation Resilience: Adaptation to Climate Change (Transportation Research Board, 2016).
C. S. Holling, Engineering Resilience versus Ecological Resilience, in Engineering within Ecological Constraints, P. C. Schulze, Ed. (The National Academies Press, 1996), pp. 31–44.
S. E. Flynn, S. P. Burke, captious Transportation Infrastructure and Societal Resilience (Center for National Policy, 2012).
T. P. Seager, S. Spierre Clark, D. A. Eisenberg, J. E. Thomas, M. M. Hinrichs, R. Kofron, C. N. Jensen, L. R. McBurnett, M. Snell, D. L. Alderson, Redesigning resilient infrastructure research, in Resilience and Risk, I. Linkov, J. M. Palma-Oliveira, Eds. (Springer, 2017).
D. Freckleton, K. Heaslip, W. Louisell, J. Collura, Evaluation of transportation network resiliency with consideration for cataclysm magnitude, paper presented at the 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2012).
S. B. Pant, Transportation network resiliency: A study of self-annealing, thesis, Utah condition University (2012).
D. King, A. Shalaby, Performance metrics and analysis of transit network resilience in Toronto, paper presented at the 95th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 10 to 14 January 2016.
D. Li, Resilience of spatial networks, in knotty Systems and Networks, J. Lü, X. Yu, G. Chen, W. Yu, Eds. (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2016), pp. 79–106.
P. M. Murray-Tuite, A Comparison of Transportation Network Resilience under Simulated System Optimum and User Equilibrium Conditions, in Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference WSC 06, 3 to 6 December 2006, pp. 1398–1405.
A. Thiagarajan, L. Ravindranath, K. LaCurts, S. Madden, H. Balakrishnan, S. Toledo, J. Eriksson, VTrack: Accurate, energy-aware road traffic retard estimation using mobile phones, in Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (ACM Press, 2009), p. 85.
E. Cho, S. A. Myers, J. Leskovec, Friendship and mobility: User movement in location-based social networks, in Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (ACM Press, 2011), p. 1082.
D. Gross, J. F. Shortie, J. M. Thompson, C. M. Harris, Fundamentals of Queueing Theory (Wiley train in Probability and Statistics, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, ed. 4, 2008).
M. Sabyasachee, Y. Wang, X. Zhu, R. Moeckel, S. Mahapatra, Comparison between gravity and destination election models for trip distribution in Maryland, paper presented at the TRB 92nd Annual Meeting of Compendium of Papers, 13 to 17 January 2013.
J. de Dios Ortúzar, L. G. Willumsen, Modelling Transport (John Wiley & Sons, ed. 4, 2011).
National Research Council (U.S.), Metropolitan Travel Forecasting: Current drill and Future Direction (Transportation Research Board, 2007).
R. Van Haaren, Assessment of Electric Cars’ compass Requirements and Usage Patterns based on Driving deportment recorded in the National Household Travel Survey of 2009 (Solar Journey, 2012), p. 25.
B. D. Greenshields, J. R. Bibbins, W. S. Channing, H. H. Miller, R. W. Crum, A study of traffic capacity, in Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Highway Research Board, 6 to 7 December 1934, vol. 1.
3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Avaya [101 Certification Exam(s) ]
AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
CheckPoint [43 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institute [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
CyberArk [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
DELL [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
HP [752 Certification Exam(s) ]
HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBM [1533 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Juniper [65 Certification Exam(s) ]
LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
Microsoft [375 Certification Exam(s) ]
Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Oracle [282 Certification Exam(s) ]
P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
Symantec [135 Certification Exam(s) ]
Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vimeo : https://vimeo.com/240171468
Issu : https://issuu.com/trutrainers/docs/a2010-578
Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11412835
Wordpress : http://wp.me/p7SJ6L-eE
weSRCH : https://www.wesrch.com/business/prpdfBU1HWO000VDNZ
Scribd : https://www.scribd.com/document/356764454/Pass4sure-A2010-578-Assess-Fundamentals-of-Applying-Tivoli-Service-Availability-Performance-Ma-exam-braindumps-with-real-questions-and-practice-soft
Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12023865
Youtube : https://youtu.be/4Z3o2BW2x28
Blogspot : http://killexams-braindumps.blogspot.com/2017/10/look-at-these-a2010-578-real-question.html
RSS Feed : http://feeds.feedburner.com/JustStudyTheseIbmA2010-578QuestionsAndPassTheRealTest
publitas.com : https://view.publitas.com/trutrainers-inc/where-can-i-get-help-to-pass-a2010-573-exam
Google+ : https://plus.google.com/112153555852933435691/posts/N67MCfd19Ma?hl=en
Calameo : http://en.calameo.com/books/004923526b6f8f3044c0a
Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/iginewcbmes1crxhu6bed56d8l819yii
zoho.com : https://docs.zoho.com/file/5bym214ca77d8bb30459280764ae29017cbbd
coursehero.com : "Excle"